How it works

How our accessibility audits work

From kickoff to report in around 14 days. Every audit combines disabled user testing, automated scans, and expert WCAG 2.2 analysis.

14-day turnaroundWCAG 2.2 mapped reporting

Process overview

A three-stage audit flow.

Disabled user testing, automated scans, then expert WCAG 2.2 reporting.

14-day turnaroundAverage from kickoff to report delivery.
  1. Step 1

    Assistive technology testing

    8-10 paid testers assess key journeys with screen readers, magnification, and keyboard navigation to uncover barriers automation misses.

  2. Step 2

    Automated scanning

    Industry-standard automated tools surface code-level issues like colour contrast, missing labels, and structural defects.

  3. Step 3

    Expert WCAG analysis

    Accessibility specialists map findings to WCAG 2.2 and produce a clear report with remediation priorities.

Pricing

Fixed pricing with a typical 14-day turnaround from kickoff to report delivery.

  • Partner rate

    Best for recurring agency delivery with priority scheduling included.

  • Ad-hoc rate

    Best for one-off projects that need the same full audit methodology.

Most common

Partner rate

£500

Agencies baking audits into their service package.

  • Full WCAG audit
  • PDF report
  • Dashboard access
  • Priority scheduling

Ad-hoc rate

£650

One-off accessibility audits.

  • Full WCAG audit
  • PDF report
  • Dashboard access

Interested in a partner relationship? Contact us to discuss volume discounts.

What's included

Scope, coverage, and delivery outputs in one audit package.

Scope & Coverage

What is covered in each audit engagement.

  • Up to 50 pages or key user journeys
  • Desktop and mobile responsive testing
  • Multi-step forms, account areas, and checkout flows
  • Static sites, CMS platforms, and SPAs

Deliverables & Outputs

What your team receives to action and report progress.

  • Detailed reports

    • Executive summary with priority findings
    • WCAG 2.2 mapping for each issue
    • Manual tester feedback with assistive-tech context
    • Remediation guidance with practical implementation notes
  • Dashboard access

    • Track remediation progress across findings
    • Share outcomes with delivery and stakeholder teams
    • Export evidence for compliance documentation
    • Clarification on findings and implementation

From insight to action

Track findings, prioritize remediation, and move delivery forward through a focused workflow.

MyAccess portal dashboard showing key metrics and recent activity.
Step 1 of 4

Monitor audit outcomes

Track critical issues, compliance progress, and recent activity across clients in one dashboard.

Filtered audits list grouped by report with tester sessions and statuses.
Step 2 of 4

Review tester evidence

See sessions grouped by report and review tester submissions before planning remediation.

MyWeb Access report remediation detail showing WCAG criteria, issue context, and fix guidance.
Step 3 of 4

Prioritize remediation

Use report-level issue detail, WCAG mapping, and fix guidance to define delivery priorities.

MyWeb Access integrations hub showing a new connection modal for GitHub and Jira.
Step 4 of 4

Send fixes to delivery tools

Create Jira or GitHub issues directly from findings so teams can move straight into implementation.

Assistive tech matrix

Multi-device

The assistive technologies and platforms our testers use during every audit. Screen readers, magnifiers, and keyboard navigation each interact with your code differently — and even tools within the same category don't behave alike. By covering what disabled people actually rely on day to day, findings reflect genuine user experience rather than theoretical compliance.

  • Screen reader

    Windows
    • Screen reader on Windows: JAWS
    • NVDA
  • Screen reader

    macOS
    • Screen reader on macOS: VoiceOver
  • Screen reader

    iOS
    • Screen reader on iOS: VoiceOver
  • Screen reader

    Android
    • Screen reader on Android: TalkBack
  • Magnification

    Windows
    • Magnification on Windows: ZoomText
  • Voice control

    Windows
    • Voice control on Windows: Dragon Professional
  • Voice control

    macOS / iOS
    • Voice control on macOS / iOS: Voice Control
  • Visual adaptation

    Windows
    • Visual adaptation on Windows: Contrast Themes
  • Input method

    Cross-platform
    • Input method on Cross-platform: Keyboard-only navigation

What we test

Manual tester feedback, automated evidence, and WCAG 2.2 checks across key devices.

Interaction & Navigation

  • Keyboard order and visible focus

    Test complete user journeys using keyboard only, including Tab, Shift+Tab, Enter, Escape, and skip links.

    Findings include broken tab sequence, hidden focus indicators, and keyboard traps with exact reproduction paths.

    • WCAG 2.1.1
    • WCAG 2.4.3
    • WCAG 2.4.7
  • Screen reader reading order and announcements

    Validate page structure and interactive controls with JAWS, NVDA, VoiceOver, and TalkBack across core flows.

    Reports document missing labels, misread state changes, and context loss during navigation.

    • WCAG 1.3.1
    • WCAG 4.1.2
  • Forms, validation, and recovery support

    Submit forms with valid and invalid inputs to assess instructions, error identification, and correction guidance.

    Each issue captures affected field patterns, error behavior, and remediation notes for engineering teams.

    • WCAG 3.3.1
    • WCAG 3.3.3
  • Dialogs, menus, and dynamic UI controls

    Exercise modals, menus, accordions, and drawers to verify focus management, dismiss controls, and escape routes.

    Output highlights focus leakage, inaccessible control states, and blocked exit paths.

    • WCAG 2.1.2
    • WCAG 2.4.6
  • Status messages and live region behavior

    Trigger loading, success, warning, and error states to confirm assistive technology announcements.

    Audit evidence notes missing or delayed announcements and unclear messaging during task completion.

    • WCAG 4.1.3
  • Pointer alternatives and gesture independence

    Check that actions relying on hover, drag, or complex gestures remain operable through simple inputs.

    Findings identify controls that exclude keyboard or non-precision input users.

    • WCAG 2.5.1
    • WCAG 2.5.7

Content & Compliance

  • Heading hierarchy and landmark clarity

    Review heading levels and landmark regions to ensure predictable page structure for navigation shortcuts.

    Reports include hierarchy gaps, skipped levels, and landmark ambiguity with page references.

    • WCAG 1.3.1
    • WCAG 2.4.1
  • Accessible names for controls and links

    Inspect buttons, links, and form controls for clear, programmatic names aligned with visible intent.

    Output identifies ambiguous labels, duplicate names, and missing control purpose.

    • WCAG 2.4.4
    • WCAG 4.1.2
  • Non-text content and alternative text quality

    Assess images, icons, and graphics for meaningful alternatives and appropriate decorative treatment.

    Findings specify missing, redundant, or misleading alternative text by element.

    • WCAG 1.1.1
  • Contrast and non-color visual cues

    Validate contrast ratios and confirm critical states are not communicated by color alone.

    Audit entries document insufficient contrast and state indicators that fail non-visual interpretation.

    • WCAG 1.4.3
    • WCAG 1.4.11
    • WCAG 1.4.1
  • Zoom, reflow, and responsive behavior

    Test layouts at 200% zoom, 400% reflow, and narrow viewports across key journeys.

    Reports capture clipping, overlap, hidden actions, and loss of task completion paths.

    • WCAG 1.4.4
    • WCAG 1.4.10
  • Content readability and instructional clarity

    Review error copy, helper text, and task instructions for clear intent and understandable next steps.

    Findings show where wording causes completion errors or blocks user progress.

    • WCAG 3.3.2
    • WCAG 3.1.5

Request a sample report

See our methodology in action with a sample accessibility audit report.

  • Executive summary with issue priorities
  • WCAG 2.2 mapping and remediation guidance
  • Example findings from manual user testing

Fields marked * are required.

We only use your details to respond to this request.

Ready when you are

Ready to get started?

See how our process works or apply for partner rates.

Fixed pricing from £500 • Typical turnaround 14 days